Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of May 2008 UK fuel economy ratings (T–Z)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

List of May 2008 UK fuel economy ratings (T–Z)

List of May 2008 UK fuel economy ratings (T–Z) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:NOTCATALOG Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 16:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 18. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 16:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

---

• Delete Not suitable content for a general purpose encyclopedia. While an individual vehicle's fuel standards are notable within the article on that vehicle, in this form it's neither particularly legible, nor does it have much encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:47, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
• Delete obsolete non-encyclopaedic info. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:16, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOTSTATSBOOK--Wikipedia is not the place for lists of statistics with no encyclopedic context. —Noiratsi (talk) 13:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.