Jaspreetsingh6
Introduction to contentious topics
editYou have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Mz7 (talk) 08:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay Thanks You Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Leave Najib ad-Dawlah from more disruptions
editYou haven't made a single edit to Sikh attacks on Delhi but instead intend excessive conflict detail on the person's page. Do not add it again not a word of it. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- i will edit again do wherever you wanted Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 10:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Then I can have the page protection increased and you won't be able to edit it at all. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- try it Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- all i have to do is complaint against you for your behaviour Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Then I can have the page protection increased and you won't be able to edit it at all. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
editNote that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.