User talk:Jaspreetsingh6/Archive1

Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Mz7 (talk) 08:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Okay Thanks You Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Leave Najib ad-Dawlah from more disruptions

edit

You haven't made a single edit to Sikh attacks on Delhi but instead intend excessive conflict detail on the person's page. Do not add it again not a word of it. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

i will edit again do wherever you wanted Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 10:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Then I can have the page protection increased and you won't be able to edit it at all. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
try it Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
all i have to do is complaint against you for your behaviour Jaspreetsingh6 (talk) 10:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaspreetsingh6. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply